IT’S SO DISHONEST!
just finished reading a lengthy article in The
Wall Street Journal ( June 9, 2010) by editorial
staff writer Dorothy Rabinowitz in which she seemed
to criticize President Barack Obama for removing the
bust of Winston Churchill from the White House and
returning it to the British government. And she
wrote, “A cloudlet of mystery has surrounded the
subject ever since.” She is so dishonest! What the
British did in Kenya, the president’s father’s home,
before, during and after Winston Churchill’s reign
was so horrible and so contrary to anything
approaching current or historical concerns about
human rights that even the British spent years
trying to hide records of its torture and deadly and
systematic abuse of an entire people with women and
children suffering the same fate as male warriors
and non-warriors alike. What the British did to the
Kenyans closely parallels much of what Hitler did to
European Jews and it is a shame that Rabinowitz
would write an article (which may or may not be
justly critical of Obama’s response to current
events) that includes such a gross distortion. If
Rabinowitz really doesn’t understand Obama’s motive
for removing Churchill’s bust from the White House
(and I don’t for a minute believe she doesn’t), she
should read “History of the Hanged” by David
Anderson and “Imperial Reckoning” by Caroline Elkins
and then, after filling in the holes in her own
education, spend some time educating the public
about Britain’s well documented history of barbarity
against Kenyans and about Obama’s measured and
incredibly graceful symbolic message to the Brits
(Churchill’s bust) that he will remain their friend
but not forget their history.
ARE THE PUNDITS NUTS!
o, President Barack Obama is responsible for the BP
oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Interesting!
ARE THE PUNDITS NUTS!
o, President Barack Obama hasn’t demonstrated enough
emotional outrage over the BP oil spill in the Gulf
of Mexico. Interesting!
ARE THE PUNDITS NUTS!
o, President Barack Obama has been too cerebral in
his response to the BP oil spill in the Gulf of
Mexico. Interesting!
ARE THE PUNDITS NUTS!
o, President Barack Obama is to be condemned for not
taking over control of the oil spill in the Gulf of
Mexico from BP. Interesting!
ARE THE PUNDITS NUTS!
o the pants President Barack Obama wore on his
recent visit to the oil spill in the Gulf were too
“fancy.” Interesting!
ARE THE PUNDITS NUTS!
o, Barack Obama is the blame for not getting out the
story of his splendid response to the Gulf oil
spill. Interesting!
ARE THE PUNDITS NUTS!
resident Obama, stay cool, stay cerebral and hold BP
accountable before and after the oil spill crisis in
the gulf has ebbed! And, keep up the good work and
ignore the pundits who insist upon reporting on the
trivial and then blaming you for not getting the
story out. As you know, the minute you show the same
degree of emotion that has been shown by past
presidents during crises, these same pundits, who
are demanding that you become emotional and less
rational, will brand you with their racially
stereotypical claim that Black folks are too
emotional and in the next election they will nail
you to the proverbial cross.
BILL O’REILLY: AT LEAST HE’S HONEST!
ntellectually honest people understand that Obama
had nothing to do with the (Gulf oil) spill, and
even with all the power the United States has,
there’s no gizmo to fix the problem and its
aftermath. For anti-Obama people, the fact that the
president is getting slimed by the slick is karma.
For pro-Obama folks, it’s very bad luck.
There comes a time when fate can determine success
or failure. Obama is a man who is used to
controlling his environment. But this environmental
disaster in the Gulf is out of everybody’s control.
And Obama knows it.” (Bill O’Reilly, The
Boston Herald, June 7, 2010)
THE ONLY SAFE APPROACH IS TO NOT BREAK THE LAW!
hy 20 members of the Congressional Black Caucus
would try to turn back the clock on Congressional
ethics rules that have resulted in investigations
against five of its members, including the venerable
Charlie Rangel, who has been forced to step down
from his chairmanship of the powerful Senate Ways
and Means Committee, is beyond me. With South
Carolina House of Representatives Whip, James
Clyburn, taking the lead, the 42-member Black Caucus
rejected the foolish move. We assume that level
headed Clyburn and those who voted with him to
stymie the effort agree with our position that
abstaining from unethical and illegal behavior is
the best approach.
BUT, RANGEL’S LOSS COULD BE CONGRESSMAN NEAL’S WIN
s quiet as it has been kept, Springfield’s
Congressman Richard Neal is making a mighty grab for
the chairmanship of the powerful Ways and Means
Committee that New York’s Charlie Rangel recently
vacated under the cloud of an ethics investigation.
And, according to The Wall Street Journal, The
Boston Globe and The Boston Herald (which
also published an editorial critical of Neal’s
recent $5,000 a person fundraiser on Cape Cod),
he has a real chance to win!
CHECK YOUR CAR DEALER OUT!
ederal Reserve reviews of car loans revealed that
car dealers consistently charge higher interest
rates to women, people of color, senior citizens and
soldiers.
RENTAL MARKET WIRED
FOR DISCRIMINATION
he Boston Herald
(June 1, 2010) reported on a study by two university
professors that showed that Craig’s list landlords
discriminated against Black renters based upon their
names. People responding to rental housing ads with
Anglo names were more likely to get a positive
response than those with Black-sounding or
Hispanic-sounding names. The only thing new in their
findings is that the discrimination long found in
housing ads in newspapers and other media also
exists on the web.
MORE FOLKS ARE MARRYING ANYBODY
n 1961, the year Barack Obama’s mixed-race parents
were married, less than one in 1,000 Black folks’
marriages were mixed. In 1980 one in 150 Black
marriages were mixed and by 2008 one in 60 were
mixed. Among the 3.8 million adults
married in 2008, 9% of all Whites, 16% of all
Blacks, 26% of all Hispanics and 31% of all Asians
married outside of their race or ethnic group. In
all, 14.6% of all new marriages in the U.S. are
mixed, six times as many as in 1960.
WHAT FATE AWAITS THOSE WHO DID NOT PASS?
suppose we should feel good about the fact that 95%
of graduating students passed the Massachusetts’
MCAS exam this year. But, what fate awaits the 3,000
who were denied a high school diploma because they
did not pass? Another 2,649, who fulfilled every
other graduation requirement, were denied diplomas
last year. 51% of the total were minorities, who
make up only 27% of seniors statewide, 43% were low
income and 58% came from urban school districts. The
real kicker is that 144,000 Massachusetts students
who attend private and religious schools can
graduate without having to take the MCAS test. We
agree with the mayor of New Bedford who proposed in
a Boston Globe editorial (June 8, 2010) that
two separate diplomas should be awarded to public
school students who take the MCAS, one called an
“MCAS high school diploma” for those who pass and
the other a “high school diploma” for those who meet
every other graduation requirement but who do not
pass the MCAS thus putting the latter group on an
equal footing with those 144,000 private school
students who will be awarded diplomas if they meet
all other graduation requirements without taking the
MCAS at all.
n